Sunday, 30 May 2010

Happy Birthday Tate Modern


I'm doing rather terribly w/this blog. Discipline isn't necessary my strong fortress and I am trying to change that. The fact is also that sometimes I found myself overwhelmed with a sense of guilt as there is so much of the other thing I need to focus on. Art is my religion but currently it seems I can only afford to turn to God when I have time! Does that make sense?

Also this blog is very personal... I write mostly for myself with an occasional visits of close friends so I  don't feel that much pressure to write. I just know I want to do more of it.

Anyhoo I cannot fail to mention in this blog the recent fabulous event of Tate Modern turning 10! (I know I know that was almost a month ago). I have been extremely busy socially and couldn't pop into the Turbine hall on the Fridays and Saturday but I was there on Sunday to join in the overwhelmingly celebratory atmosphere at the Tate Modern.

I attended "No Soul for Sale", which took place in the Turbine Hall, where independent art spaces of contemporary art all over the world meet in one place  to show case their work. Their artistic declarations also filled the halls. I had seen San Art, a organization/gallery based in Ho Chi Minh City - Vietnam on the programme and I really wanted to meet them! More about San Art later.

Contempory art arrived in Great Britain later than other European countries, even later than the United States*. Tate is only 10 year old but it is doing extremely well. One of the most visited contemporary art galleries in the world (5million± visits annually)... Even more than the MOMA. I think Sir Nicholas Serota has achieved so much for Tate Modern and Tate in general under his directorship... He is a big inspiration, such a brilliant, visionary but humble man.

This is a great documentary marking Tate Modern's 10 years on the Culture Show . I also love the BBC! It constantly feeds my thirst for knowledge in many areas.

These are some videos from Tate Channel as it celebrate Tate Modern's birthday!





Some interesting facts --- did you know that the Museum of Modern Art opened in 1929, the year of the Great Depression. And even though with a then young man Alfred Barr as its director (he was only twenty-seven), it was actually formulated by three women, so-called by art historians as "the founding mothers". They were Abbie Rockefeller, Miss Lizzie P. Bliss and Mrs Cornelius J Sullivan.

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

Tuesday, 18 May 2010

BBC1's Modern Masters

There is a wonderful new programme on BBC1 called "Modern Masters" charting the life and explaining the works of modern artists that influenced contemporary art, design and architecture. I am enjoying the series enormously as Matisse, Dali and Picasso are each dedicated an episode.  Including Andy Warhol.

The programme is presented by Alastair Sooke, who is only 28. His boyish charm, enthusiasm and at times emotional moment really bring an engaging and exciting light to younger audience. It feels like a friend is telling you all these things rather than a university professor lecturing you.  I was a bit speechless when Alistair was sitting in Matisse's cathedral and was somewhat overwhelmed by what he saw... I am generally not a big fan of men who cry so it was surprising to see his emotions. In a good way.

Even though I know about the lives and works of these artists, I still learned new things about them from this series. I thought that each episode was very comprehensive and well-made in the span of only 60 minutes.

People in the UK watch it here!

MODERN MASTERS

Abstract from Press Release w/Alastair


Why were these four artists (Picasso, Matisse, Dali, and Warhol) chosen for BBC One's Modern Masters?

There were arguments to be made for a number of 20th-century artists, but the ones we chose all had something in common: in their own lifetimes they were international celebrities, multimillionaires who were lauded by the general public, and not just the critics. As a result, they had a profound influence not only on art history, but also on the world around us. In so many ways, we can still see their legacy today.

Filming must have been quite an experience...

We spent three months filming towards the end of 2009, and I had the time of my life. One minute I was interviewing John Richardson, the most respected Picasso scholar in the world; the next, I was chatting to Dennis Hopper, who used to hang out with Warhol in the Sixties. That's what I wanted to illustrate in this series: modern art doesn't only belong in the gallery, but touches on so many different and surprising areas, from film to fashion to architecture – even car design.

Did you discover much you didn't know about the four artists?

Yes! You learn so much more about an artist by following in his or her footsteps. Of course, I'd read a great deal about their careers, but seeing the places where they lived and made art, and meeting people who actually knew them, gave me an entirely new sense of their work. And seeing many of their masterpieces at first hand in museums all over the world, often when nobody else was there – well, that was a real thrill, and an immense privilege.

What do you think motivated them?

None of our modern masters followed the rules handed down to them by academic tradition and art history. Picasso was inspired by the African masks and tribal sculpture that he discovered in Parisian flea-shops, whereas most young artists of his era were dutifully studying antique sculptures in the Louvre. Matisse pioneered Fauvism by painting the world around him in bright, almost delirious colours that made people laugh in his face and assume he was nothing but a lunatic. Dali's paintings encapsulated his own fears and anxieties and deepest desires with a candour never before seen in the history of art. And Warhol broke every rule going: he aspired to become a machine, churning out screen-printed works of art in his studio, which was known as the Factory, at a time when people prized the individuality and painterly touch of artists above everything else. I found that inspirational.

Did they have anything in common?

The thing that really struck me was that none of them conformed to anything. For years, Picasso was courted by the Surrealists – but he never wanted to pin himself down to any one art movement. All of the artists had a restless, almost anarchic spirit – even Matisse, who looks so professorial, in his suit and tie, in the photographs of him that have survived. They refused to accept convention. They wanted to break with tradition, and, to do this, earned for themselves a great sense of personal freedom. There's some kind of life lesson in that.

Was filming the series an intense experience for you personally?

I was surprised by my reaction to several works of art, but perhaps most memorable of all was my visit to the Dominican chapel that Matisse designed, down to the very last detail, towards the end of his life in the small town of Vence where he lived in southern France. I found it so moving that someone so old, who had come through so much, could meticulously plan and build such a beautifully tranquil space. Here was a man who had often suffered from terrible anxiety, who was a rabid insomniac for much of his life, who had survived duodenal cancer, and who had lived to hear his daughter's terrible memories of being tortured by the Gestapo during the Second World War. And he had built such a special space, which was the culmination of his life's work as well as a real triumph of the human spirit over adversity. I was overwhelmed. I could have stayed there all day.

Do you wish you had been alive at the same time as these modern masters?

Absolutely. That period of early modernism now feels like such a heroic golden age in the history of art. These artists were titanic figures, wrestling with the past, breaking with tradition, and forging a completely new visual language that was simply extraordinary. I think it must have been really intoxicating to live through that era. I like to think I would have championed their work. But, if so, I would have been in a real minority, since most people at the time thought that these artists were completely crazy!

Did you encounter anything unexpected during filming?

I expected to interview some important people in the art world, for sure, but I never thought in a million years that I'd share a drink with Pamela Anderson, chat to Dennis Hopper, or exchange a few words with the French president's wife, Carla Bruni-Sarkozy! Lots of people find Noel Fielding from the Mighty Boosh hilarious – and here he was telling me that Dali's Surrealist vision had an enormous influence on his decision to become a comedian. It just goes to prove that the work of these four modern masters continues to touch people in all areas of life today. That's really amazing.

Tuesday, 20 April 2010

Ashile Gorky - holding on to the past (part 1)

The current Tate exhibition Ashile Gorky: a restropective is the first major exhibition of its kind since 1981. This is a comprehensive display of the works of one of American's best painters, Gorky, a seminal figure in the movement towards abstraction that transformed American art. The exhibition examines Gorky's 178 bodies of work throughout his entire career from 1920s until his death in 1948.

This was the first time I encountered Gorky. I wanted to write a post on his work a while ago but somehow I couldn't find the words. I made a recent discovery that I like to test myself with time on what I truly think of with anything art related. That is what so great about it, it's like a good book. You read it again and again. And everytime there is something new. You can't really make up your mind besides that you really like it. That is also why it took me so long to write about Van Gogh, on which I haven't really finished.

The reason I find it difficult to write with Gorky is that he was another great artist with a tragic past and a tragic exit. His life story, like his works, is haunting. Then I can't help but wonder if knowing the life stories' of the artists really influence the way you look at their work? Does that information help you appreciate and understand their of art more? Or the work should stand on its own.

Ashile gorky was born Vostanik Manoog Adoyan in 1904 in the village of Khorgom, Armenia. He grew up when the Armenia genocide was happening. His father had fled to the United States earlier on, where he started a new life. This was when the photograph of Ashile and his mother was taken and sent to America, as a remind to his father not to forget them. Ashile's mother eventually died from starvation before the family was reunited. A year after her death his sister and him went to America where he realized that his father had restarted his life long ago. Ashile's heart was broken. He then changed his name to Gorky, after the famous Russian writer Maxim Gorky. And became a painter.

Little is said of Gorky's formal art training apart from that he enrolled at the New School of Design in Boston. Though it was quite évident that Gorky was also a self-taught artists and spent a good amount of time at the Museum of Art studying the masters. He very much admired the work of Cezanne, Kadinsky, Picasso.. And adopted their style in his early days as a painter. One of the most fascinating aspect of this exhibition was the trace of Gorky's style development, starting with copying work of previous masters to finding his own footprints. In many ways I felt his life stories are also embedded in his own personal styles.

Gorky was first known for his heavy application of paints. He would work on a painting for years, redrawing and applying paint to the point where you could judge the painting by its weight. Mouchou (his wife) said that sometimes a painting would change since the last time she saw it. Asked why he kept changing his work, he said that he would never finish a painting. Because once finished, it is as if it has died.

Does this explain Gorky's 10 year period working on the portraits of him and his mother? The portraits (1926-1936) was re-drawn from the photo that they had sent to his father to remind him of their existence. There is something so humble, so beautiful, so haunting about these paintings (he made two). I find myself unable to tear away from his mother's gaze. Did Gorky take so long to finish them because he simply couldn't let go of his mother, of his past? This was a theme that clearly dominated the first part of the exhibition.

The artist and his mother (1926-1936)
the Painting on the left is currently at the National Gallery of Art Washington DC (photo @NGA)
that on the right is at the Whitney Museum of American Art, NYC (photo @wikipedia)

Both are on display at the Tate exhibition.

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

Monday, 5 April 2010

Van Gogh: Painted by Words

"Drawing is the root of everything."
My plan is not to spare myself. Not to avoid a lot of difficulties and emotions. It is of relative indifference to me whether I live a long or a short time. I'm concerned with the world only in that I have a certain obligation or duty, if you like, having walked the world for 30 years... to leave a souvenir of gratitude in the form of paintings or drawings.


For those of you who are interested, and who live in the UK... this is a well worth drama-documentary to watch about Van Gogh. Only available for the next 30 days on BBC iplayer.

Van Gogh: Painted by Words

Sunday, 4 April 2010

The Real Van Gogh



To WH and TC, both of whom I wish I had brought to see this exhibition before they went to Amsterdam.

When you look at a Van Gogh painting, what do you see? Do you see the brilliant and beautiful contrasting colours, or the "madness" of the paint brush? Do you remember the vibrant colours but such sad and somewhat troublesome mood? Do you know of Van Gogh as a crazy artist who cut of his ear? Whose self portraits seem to penetrate the soul of his sitter like a Dorian Gray?

If you answer "yes" to any of the questions above, you should visit the currently running exhibition at the Royal Academy of Art in London - The Real Van Gogh: the artist and his letters. One of the most intriguing exhibitions I have seen this year.

What we are told about someone before we really know them usually influence the way we think about them -- and with artists, the way we look at their work. Sometimes we need to go that extra mile to really discover them for who they are, and not what they were told to be. This is exactly what the exhibition did -- offering you the chance to know the "real" Van Gogh.

By investigating an abundant resource of the artist's letters, most of which were written to his brother, Theo, the RA has brought to London a major Van Gogh exhibition for the first time in 40 years. And by looking at his works from a perspective that I learned has never before been so fully investigated in one exhibition - his letters.

There are 40 letters exhibited that traces the Van Gogh's artistic development from the moment he decided to become an artist at the age of 27. During his short artistic career, Van Gogh is probably the artist that wrote the most about his works. Many of the paintings and sketches on show were accompanied by the letters in which Van Gogh used words beautifully to pre-paint his vision of work he planned to do. Despite the lack in presence of a few key pieces such as "The potato eaters" the body of works presented there were extraordinary.

Van Gogh was not only a remarkable painter but he was also an educated and a beautiful writer. He read extensively, literature pre- and of his time including many English writers such as Shakespeare, Elliot and Dickens. Van Gogh spoke and wrote fluently Dutch, French and English -- though most of his letters were written in the two prior languages. And although his artistic career only spread for a decade or so, Van Gogh has produced a phenomenal amount of work (over 800 bodies of work) and is one of the most hard-working self taught artists I have ever known.

Van Gogh worked relentlessly. Firstly with sketching and perspective drawing; then to figure painting which he found "most difficult". Lastly he tackled portraits, which he thought "(were) the highest goal an artist can achieve". He progressed from water colour to oil painting while self-teaching Delacroix's colour theory. His works were influenced by inspirations he found along the way, either it be literature or in Japanese prints, which also became a huge influence in his landscape paintings and portraiture.

Van Gogh's art wasn't accepted then... He never sold a piece in his lifetime. His techniques were regarded as clumsy (figures) and although he later lightened his palette to match those of the impressionists, Van Gogh's style was always on a course of its own. Sometimes having your own style means unpopularity.

What I love most about this exhibition was two things
1. I was truly blown away by getting to see some of his work in person like The Two Empty Chairs (1888), his self portrait, the dried sunflower, Hospital at Saint-Remy (1889) and many of the landscape paintings ... I have always been fascinated with his use of colours and the way he really painted what he felt. But I was so moved by his commitment and dedication, by his intellect and "genius".
2. Another wonderful thing that surface this exhibition was the brotherly love, support and respect between Van Gogh and Theo. I am sure there were times of difficulties and conflict between them. But no matter what course life takes, what is more precious than having someone who believes in you?

I will share in the next few posts details of some of the work I love.
 
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

Monday, 29 March 2010

Testing MoBlogging

I am only just checking out Mobile blogging. It is fab :) Camel is about to write on the go...the suit-case kid style!


.Arabian.Night.2008.
By Huma Mulji
(Currently exhibited at the Saatchi Gallery, London)

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

Sunflowers Stories


Van Gogh - Still Life : Twelve Sunflowers (Aug 1888)
To my mum
Mother to child:
"You know the other day I was looking at the two new still life paintings that I recently finished and I suddenly realized how much of myself was painted in there. And I thought of your sunflowers in the bathroom. Remember what you told me about them?


You were going through a rather stressful time and you came home to us. All troubled and shattered. And you painted these sunflowers in the bathroom (as a commission by me) and told me "Mom, it's like I'm painting our family. That's dad all the way up there, tall, strong and looking over us; you - always in the centre, bright and happy and me who is always the different ones. There are those of age like grandpa and grandma and the little ones"


Now the more I think about what you painted, and with time, the more I realize how I see things through your lens. Dad is the flower looking away, but that' him... he tends to deal with conflict and crisis like that leaving me to confront things. And I'm there in the middle trying to be strong for everyone to hold us all together. You just look crazy, though one of a kind, your sunflower is really crazy as if it has just survived a storm. Petals shattered on the ground even. And you know what, the little ones were looking at you with that strange look as if they were asking "Who the hell is she? Why is she so weird?".




Anyhow for some reasons the two Still Life I recently did. Of two vases of flowers, which were also in their late primes. I remember painting them when I was making this major decisions in my life. I wasn't torn by that decision, in fact I had wanted it. I guess my choice of subject has unconsciously told me that "it was time to leave". Interesting, isn't it?"


Child: 
Mom, I was merely trying to copy Van Gogh's sunflowers but I really couldn't paint the whole "mural" of sunflowers in his style. I really did thought his sunflowers were different and quirky and I always want to be a bit different. But yes it it interesting that you had thought of that. 


Van Gogh - Still Life: Three Sunflowers (Aug 1888)


Did Van Gogh's way of painting really represented his state of mind? Did his brush strokes and colours really tell you that he was a bit ... not there. Bonkers?


Van Gogh: Still Life - Two cut Sunflowers (Aug-Sept 1887)

Van Gogh paintings photo credits http://www.vangoghgallery.com